Wheel vs LEAPS vs Poor Man's Covered Call: Which Options Strategy Is Best for You?

By Cash Flow University ยท ยท 8 min read

Wheel vs LEAPS vs Poor Man's Covered Call: Which Options Strategy Is Best for You?

Compare three powerful options strategies: the Wheel, LEAPS, and Poor Man's Covered Call (PMCC). Learn which approach fits your capital, risk tolerance, and trading style with real examples and a detailed comparison matrix.

Look, when I first started trading options, the number of strategies felt overwhelming. I spent months bouncing between approaches, losing money on some, making it back on others. After years of trial and error, I keep coming back to three strategies that actually work: the Wheel, LEAPS, and the Poor Man's covered call (PMCC). Each has its place depending on your capital, risk tolerance, and what you're trying to accomplish.

I've traded all three of these for years now. Some I love. Some I've grown frustrated with at times. But I want to give you an honest breakdown of what I've learned through hands-on experience, not textbook theory.

๐Ÿ“บ Watch the full video breakdown of these three strategies

3
Strategies Compared
$5K-$50K+
Capital Range
70-80%
PMCC Capital Savings
1-2+ Years
LEAPS Duration

The Wheel Strategy

The Wheel is probably the most popular income strategy in options trading. Here's the thing: it's basically just combining two strategies you probably already know. You sell cash-secured puts, and if you get assigned, you flip to selling covered calls. Rinse and repeat. Simple in concept, but the execution matters.

The Wheel Strategy Cycle: Sell Put โ†’ Get Assigned โ†’ Sell Covered Call โ†’ Stock Called Away โ†’ Repeat

The Wheel Strategy: A continuous cycle of selling puts and covered calls

How It Actually Works

Step 1: Sell a Cash-Secured Put. Pick a stock you'd genuinely want to own. Sell a put, collect premium upfront. If the stock stays above your strike, you keep the money. Easy. If it drops below your strike? You buy the shares. That's not a loss, that's the plan.

Step 2: Get Assigned. Now you own shares, but at a discount. Your real cost basis is the strike price minus whatever premium you collected. Most traders see this as a feature, not a bug.

Step 3: Sell Covered Calls. You've got shares now. Sell calls against them. More premium. Your cost basis drops even further.

Step 4: Repeat. Shares get called away? Cool. Sell another put and start again.

Real Example: My Rigetti (RGTI) Trade

I ran this exact strategy on Rigetti (RGTI) last year. Volatile stock, which means fat premiums. I sold puts, got assigned, then sold calls for months. By the time I was done, I'd driven my cost basis down over 15% from where I first entered. Even with the stock whipping around like crazy, the premium I collected cushioned everything. Ended up profitable on a stock that would have crushed a buy-and-hold approach.

โœ… What I Like About the Wheel

  • Consistent premium income
  • You buy stocks at prices you're happy with
  • Dead simple once you understand it
  • Works great in sideways markets
  • Each cycle lowers your cost basis

โŒ The Downsides

  • You need real capital (100 shares per contract)
  • Ties up margin while waiting for assignment
  • If the stock craters, you're stuck holding bags
  • You might miss huge rallies
  • Realistically need $25K+ to do this properly

LEAPS: The Long Game

LEAPS are just options that don't expire for a year or more. Sometimes two or three years out. The appeal? You get leveraged exposure to a stock's movement without putting up the full cost of shares. Think of it like buying a 2-year lease on a Ferrari for the price of a used Honda. You get the speed, but if you don't use it before the lease is up, you walk away with nothing.

LEAPS Profit/Loss Diagram showing break-even point and unlimited upside potential

LEAPS Profit/Loss Profile: Limited downside, unlimited upside potential

Why LEAPS Work for Long-Term Plays

Regular options expire too fast. Your thesis might be right, but if the timing is off by a month, you lose everything. LEAPS give your idea time to breathe. If you're bullish on a company but don't want to tie up $50,000 in shares, a deep in-the-money LEAPS call might cost you $8,000-$12,000 while giving you similar upside exposure.

The big advantages: leverage with time (you control 100 shares for a fraction of the cost) and defined risk (your max loss is what you paid). That's it. You can't lose more than the premium.

My Novo Nordisk (NVO) Trade

I had great results with Novo Nordisk (NVO) as a LEAPS play. The thesis was simple: GLP-1 weight loss drugs were exploding, and NVO dominated that market. I didn't want to buy the stock outright, so I grabbed deep in-the-money calls with 18-month expirations. The stock ran. My LEAPS ran harder. I sold for a solid profit without ever owning a single share. That's the power of this approach: participate in big moves with way less capital at risk.

๐Ÿ’ก Delta Selection Tip

When buying LEAPS as a stock replacement, I look for options with a delta of 0.70-0.85. This gives you solid price participation while keeping time decay manageable. The deeper you go in-the-money, the more your LEAPS acts like actual stock.

โœ… What I Like About LEAPS

  • Leverage without margin
  • Lower capital than buying shares
  • Time for your thesis to play out
  • Max loss is capped at your premium
  • Great for high-conviction plays

โŒ The Downsides

  • Premium can be expensive upfront
  • Time decay still eats at you (slowly)
  • No dividends
  • Less liquid than stock
  • You need to be right on direction

The Poor Man's Covered Call: Income on a Budget

Here's the thing about covered calls: they're great, but they require a lot of capital. Buying 100 shares of a $200 stock means locking up $20,000. The PMCC is basically renting to sublet. Instead of buying shares, you buy a LEAPS call as your "stock substitute" and sell shorter-dated calls against it. Same income strategy, fraction of the capital.

Poor Man's Covered Call vs Traditional Covered Call capital comparison

PMCC vs Traditional Covered Call: Same income strategy, fraction of the capital

How It Works

The Long Leg: Buy a deep in-the-money LEAPS call with a high delta (0.70-0.85). This is your stock substitute. It gives you the right to control 100 shares worth of movement.

The Short Leg: Sell shorter-dated, out-of-the-money calls against your LEAPS. This generates income just like a traditional covered call, but with 70-80% less capital tied up.

The Cycle: Short calls expire worthless or you close them for profit. Sell new ones. Repeat. Meanwhile, your LEAPS appreciates (hopefully) in the background.

Netflix PMCC Example

Let's use Netflix (NFLX) trading around $85. A traditional covered call needs $8,500 to buy 100 shares. With a PMCC:

You've invested $3,200 instead of $8,500. That's a 62% reduction in capital while still collecting monthly premium. If you can pull in $100-$150 monthly, that's 3-5% return on your LEAPS investment. Every month.

Metric Traditional Covered Call Poor Man's Covered Call
Capital Required $8,500 $3,200
Monthly Income Potential $100-$150 $100-$150
Return on Capital ~1.5% monthly ~4% monthly
Maximum Risk Full stock value ($8.5K) LEAPS premium ($3.2K)
Dividends Yes (if applicable) No

โœ… What I Like About PMCC

  • 70-80% less capital needed
  • Higher percentage returns
  • Max loss is defined
  • Recurring income stream
  • Perfect for smaller accounts

โŒ The Downsides

  • More moving parts to manage
  • No dividend income
  • Early assignment can mess things up
  • Your LEAPS still has time decay
  • Need to understand spreads and Greeks

Which Strategy Should You Actually Use?

Forget the textbook for a second. Here's my honest take on when to use each one:

Factor Wheel LEAPS PMCC
Minimum Capital $25,000+ $5,000+ $10,000+
Primary Goal Income + Stock Acquisition Leveraged Growth Capital-Efficient Income
Time Horizon Ongoing 1-3 Years Months
Complexity โญโญ Low โญโญ Low-Medium โญโญโญ Medium
Max Loss Stock goes to $0 Premium paid LEAPS premium
Best Market Sideways/Slightly Up Bullish Bullish/Sideways
Stock Ownership Yes (when assigned) No No

My Honest Take

Use the Wheel if: You've got $25K+ and actually want to own stocks. It's perfect for retirement accounts where assignment is welcome, not scary. You're playing the long game and don't mind holding through volatility.

Use LEAPS if: You have a strong opinion on where a stock is headed over the next year or two. You want leverage without the stress of short-term options. Set it and forget it (mostly).

Use PMCC if: You love the idea of covered calls but don't have $50K lying around. You're comfortable with a bit more complexity. You want to maximize return on every dollar you put to work.

๐Ÿ“ A Note on IRAs

All three strategies work in retirement accounts. The Wheel is particularly popular in IRAs because you actually want assignment (you're buying shares at your price). PMCC might need Level 2 or 3 options approval depending on your broker. Check with Fidelity, Schwab, or TD Ameritrade for their specific requirements.

Go Deeper

I put together a presentation that walks through each strategy with visual examples and real trade setups. If you want the details, check it out:

๐Ÿ“Š View the Full Strategy Presentation

๐ŸŽฏ Want to See These Strategies in Action?

Join Cash Flow University. You'll get real trade alerts, educational resources, and a community that's actively running these plays every week.

Get Your Free Starter Kit โ†’

Frequently Asked Questions

Which strategy requires the least capital?

LEAPS typically need the least, often starting around $5,000 for stocks in the $50-$100 range. PMCC requires a bit more ($10,000+) because you need both the LEAPS and margin for short calls. The Wheel needs the most ($25,000+) since you have to be ready to buy 100 shares if assigned.

Can I use the Poor Man's Covered Call in an IRA?

Yes, usually. The PMCC is technically a diagonal spread, and most brokers allow defined-risk spreads in IRAs. You'll need Level 2 or Level 3 options approval depending on your broker. Fidelity, Schwab, and TD Ameritrade all support spread trading in retirement accounts with proper approval.

What happens if I get assigned on a Wheel trade?

That's the plan! When your short put gets assigned, you buy 100 shares at the strike price. Your effective cost is the strike minus the premium you collected. From there, you switch to selling covered calls against your shares. The key is only selling puts on stocks you'd be happy to own anyway.

How do I pick stocks for these strategies?

For all three, focus on liquid stocks with active options markets. Tight bid-ask spreads, high open interest. For the Wheel, pick stocks you'd hold long-term. For LEAPS and PMCC, look for strong fundamentals and growth potential. I typically avoid initiating positions right before earnings unless that's part of my thesis.

These three strategies changed how I approach the market. Whether you want steady income from the Wheel, leveraged growth with LEAPS, or capital-efficient income through PMCC, they all work. The trick is matching the strategy to your situation: your capital, your time, your risk tolerance.

If any of this clicked for you, come join us at Cash Flow University. We're running these strategies every single day.

โ† Back to Blog